SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 21791

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
T. VINOD KUMAR, J
Smt Sangeeta – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

Since the issue involved in all these Writ Petitions is one and the same, they are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development appearing for respondent No.1, Sri M.A.K. Mukheed, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent

Nos.2 and 3, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent No.4 and perused the record.

3. It is the common case of the petitioners that they are in possession of land admeasuring 120 sq. yards each wherein they have constructed a tin shed room 20 years ago; and that the said construction made by them is also being assessed to property tax by the respondent authorities. It is the further case of the petitioners that on making the construction they had obtained electricity and water supply connections from the concerned authorities for the said property, thereby evidencing the fact that the petitioners are in possession of the said property.

4. It is the further case of the petitioners that while they are in possession of the plot of land admeasuring 120 Sq.yds each, having

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top