SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 22833

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
The Prudential Cooperative Bank Ltd. rastrapathi Rao – Appellant
Versus
The A.P. Cooperative Tribunal Chandravihar – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

WRIT PETITIONS No. 10029 AND 13025 OF 2008 In Writ Petition No. 10029 of 2008, heard Sri M.

Venkata Divakar, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Cooperation on behalf of the Tribunal, Sri G. Rama Sharma, learned counsel for the 1 st respondent, Sri R.V.Nagabhushanam Rao, learned counsel for the 4 th respondent. In Writ Petition No. 13025 of 2008, heard Sri R.V. Nagabhushanam Rao, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Cooperation on behalf of the 1 st respondent and Sri M. Venkata Divakar, learned counsel for the 6 th respondent.

2. Both these Writ Petitions are preferred against the Judgment in O.P. No. 1038 of 2000 dated 18.02.2008 on the file of the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal at Hyderabad. Hence, with the consent of learned counsel for both the parties, these Writ Petitions are disposed of by this common order.

3. Parties are referred to as arrayed in O.P. No.1038 of

2000. Petitioner is Bank. Respondent No.1 is borrower, Respondents 2 to 7 are guarantors and Respondent No.8 is purchaser of the property in question.

4. Petitioner’s case is that Respondent Nos. 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top