HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
ALOK ARADHE, CJ, ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI, J
Neeraj Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
MRS. Priya Shah – Respondent
COMMON ORDER:
Counsel representing RVR Associates for the petitioner.
2. In these writ petitions, petitioner has called in question the validity of the common order, dated 14.11.2008, passed in O.R.A.Nos.128/2007/TM/CH, 129/2007/TM/CH and 130/2007/TM/CH. In order to
According to respondent No.1, she has been using the aforesaid trade mark continuously and extensively since 01.04.1996 and the same has become a well known mark within the meaning of Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). As per the case of respondent No.1, the petitioner was associated and was residing as a family member of respondent No.1 for several years, but later on separated from the family and started his own business in Hyderabad in the name and style of “Show Off”. The petitioner with an ulterior motive got the trad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.