SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 24192

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Smt Zareena Tabassum – Appellant
Versus
Banka Purushotham – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

The lis involved in these civil revision petitions and the parties are one and the same. Therefore, the same were heard together and decided by way of this common order:-

2. Heard Mr. Mohd. Afzal Pasha, learned counsel representing Sri Mohd. Imtiaz Uddin Siddique, learned counsel for the petitioner in both the revisions and Sri V.Ravi Kiran Rao, learned Senior counsel, representing Sri N.Janardhan Reddy, learned counsel for the 1st respondent/plaintiff in CRP No.3745 of 2024.

3. 1st respondent/plaintiff had filed a suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction against the petitioner/Respondent Nos.2 to 32 herein. The petitioner herein/defendant No.4 was set ex parte on 29.07.2013. She has filed I.A.No.1408 of 2023 under Order IX Rule 7 read with 151 of CPC to set aside the ex parte decree dated 29.07.2013. Vide order dated 02.01.2024, learned trial Court referring to the principle laid down by the Apex Court in Sangram Singh v.

Election Tribunal, [1995 AIR 425], in paragraph No.11, made certain observations and allowed the application setting aside the ex parte order dated

29.07.2013.

4. The petitioner had filed a written statement along with said I.A.No.1408 of 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top