SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 21642

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
SMT. LAXMAMMA PENTAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SUSHEELAMMA AND 7 OTHERS – Respondent


J U D G M E N T :

Aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No.

29 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Special Judge for Trial of Offences under SC/ST (POA) Act-cum-V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, dated 09.08.2011, plaintiff in the suit initially preferred this Appeal. During the pendency of appeal, she died and her legal representatives were brought on record as Appellants 2 to 4 vide order dated

27.09.2022 in 1.A. No. 3 of 2022.

2. For convenient sake, parties are referred to as arrayed in Original Suit.

3. As per the averments of plaint, one Badam Anthi Reddy was owner of agricultural lands (i) Ac. 1-29 guntas in Survey No. 94/AA; (ii) Ac. 0-13 guntas in Survey No. 97/EE; (m) Ac. 0-27 guntas in Survey No. 98/EE; (iv) Ac.1.12 guntas in Survey No. 204/EE situated at Tellapur Village, R.C. Puram Mandal of Medak District.

It is also averred in the plaint that Badam Anthi Reddy is the owner of agricultural lands of Acs. 2.00 guntas in Survey No. 444 and Acs. 4-00 guntas in Survey No. 445/AA situated at Tellapur Village, R.C. Puram Mandal of Medak District. However, defendants disputed this contention.

Plaintiff and defendants 1, 2 and 3 are daughters of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top