HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
E. V. VENUGOPAL, J
Shaik Nazeer Basha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
Please provide the legal document content (inside
ORDER:
The present Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 12.11.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.4092 of 2024 in S.C.No.21 of 2019, on the file of the learned Session Judge, Hyderabad.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/A4 and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent-State. Perused the entire material on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in S.C.No.21 of 2019, the petitioner/accused No.4 had engaged a counsel and when the matter came up for hearing on 12.11.2024, the trial Court has observed that the accused was called absent and there was no representation on behalf of the accused and therefore, the Court had issued an NBW (Non-Bailable Warrant) against the accused and posted the matter for hearing therefore, an NBW was issued against the accused. The contention of the petitioner is that he was suffering from ill-health and he informed his counsel and requested him to file an application seeking dispense with his personal appearance, inadvertently the counsel on record arrived before the trial Court just after the issuance of warrant against the petitioner. The counsel on record immediately filed an application u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.