HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. SUJANA, J
Smt. Sarabudla Sunanda Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Vattipalli Srinivas – Respondent
COMMON ORDER:
Since the issue involved in both the civil revision petitions is one and the same, they are being heard and disposed of together by way of this common order.
2.
C.R.P.No.1580 of 2024 is filed challenging the order dated 09.02.2024 passed in I.A.No.700 of 2023 in O.S.No.196 of 2018 by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhongir.
3.
C.R.P.No.1581 of 2024 is filed challenging the order dated 12.02.2024 passed in I.A.No.403 of 2023 in O.S.No.196 of 2018 by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhongir.
4. The brief facts of the cases are that the trial court dismissed the applications of the petitioner, I.A.No.403 of 2023 and I.A.No.700 of 2023, which sought to permit Kankanth Reddy Ramesh Reddy to come on record as the GPA holder and represent the defendant in the suit. The trial Court held that the respondent/plaintiff wanted to confront the alleged agreement of sale to the person who executed it, not to the petitioner who had no knowledge of the agreement. The trial Court observed that the petitioner was not the right person to depose about the agreement, as he was not aware of its contents, and therefore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.