HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
SUJOY PAUL, J
Pachipulusu Subramanyam – Appellant
Versus
C.Chandramma Died – Respondent
ORDER:
With consent finally heard Sri G. VasanthaRayudu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri R. Anurag, learned counsel for respondents.
2. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenges the order dated 18.03.2024 whereby, I.A.No.6336 of 2023 in O.S.No.210 of 2020 on the file of Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad, is decided.
FACTS:-
3. The admitted facts between the parties are that the main suit is filed by the deceased/plaintiff No.1 and her husband seeking eviction, recovery of arrears of rent and damages against the defendants. Plaintiff No.1 died on 16.10.2023 leaving behind her husband i.e., plaintiff No.2 and her children by names C.
Chandrashekar, C. Sridhar, Navageetha, Sangeetha and Saritha.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners/defendants submits that the deceased/plaintiff No.1 had allegedly executed a Will Deed dated 06.01.2022 bequeathing her half share in the suit schedule property in favour of her sons C. Chandrashekar and C. Sridhar. Thus, plaintiff No.2 intended to implead them as proposed plaintiff Nos.3 and 4 in the main suit and to carry out consequential corrections to the plaint.
5. The respondents filed their counter to the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.