SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 596

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
SUJOY PAUL, J
Pachipulusu Subramanyam – Appellant
Versus
C.Chandramma Died – Respondent


ORDER:

With consent finally heard Sri G. VasanthaRayudu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri R. Anurag, learned counsel for respondents.

2. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenges the order dated 18.03.2024 whereby, I.A.No.6336 of 2023 in O.S.No.210 of 2020 on the file of Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad, is decided.

FACTS:-

3. The admitted facts between the parties are that the main suit is filed by the deceased/plaintiff No.1 and her husband seeking eviction, recovery of arrears of rent and damages against the defendants. Plaintiff No.1 died on 16.10.2023 leaving behind her husband i.e., plaintiff No.2 and her children by names C.

Chandrashekar, C. Sridhar, Navageetha, Sangeetha and Saritha.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners/defendants submits that the deceased/plaintiff No.1 had allegedly executed a Will Deed dated 06.01.2022 bequeathing her half share in the suit schedule property in favour of her sons C. Chandrashekar and C. Sridhar. Thus, plaintiff No.2 intended to implead them as proposed plaintiff Nos.3 and 4 in the main suit and to carry out consequential corrections to the plaint.

5. The respondents filed their counter to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top