ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. assailing the judgment, dated 31.12.2013, passed in Criminal Appeal No.39 of 2012 by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, L.B.Nagar confirming the judgment, dated 18.01.2012, in C.C.No.26 of 2011 on the file of the II Special Magistrate Court, Kukatpally at Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District.

2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that both the courts below erred in convicting the petitioner without taking into consideration the plea of the petitioner that the cheque was given to one K.L.Satyanarayana for the purpose of taking loan, but, said Satayanarayana without arranging the loan, misused the promissory note and cheque by utilizing the first respondent-complainant, who is no way concerned to the petitioner. It is further contended that the Courts below failed to appreciate the contention of the petitioner that there was no legally enforceable debt against him. The Courts below ought to have taken into consideration the contention of the petitioner that there was no existence of legally enforceable debt. Therefore, the findings recorded by the Courts below