SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 18464

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
M.G.PRIYADARSINI, J
Smt. G.Varalaxmi – Appellant
Versus
Mende Sunil Kumar Yadav – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20.11.2018 in O.S.No.30 of 2014 (hereinafter will be referred as ‘impugned judgment’) passed by the learned VI Additional District Judge at Siddipet (hereinafter will be referred as ‘trial Court’), the defendant No.2 preferred the present appeal to set aside the impugned judgment.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter are referred to as they are arrayed before the trial Court.

3. The brief facts of the case, which necessitated the appellant to file the present appeal, are as follows:

a) The plaintiff filed O.S.No.30 of 2014 against defendant Nos.1 and 2 seeking specific performance of agreement of sale – cum- GPA and to declare the registered sale deed bearing document No.6153 of 2014 dated 08.05.2014 as null and void and not binding on the plaintiff and for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaintiff in respect of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.4.24 guntas in Sy.No.61 of Brahmanpally Village, Toopran Mandal, Medak District (hereinafter will be referred as suit schedule property). The brief averments of the plaint are as under:

i) Defenda

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top