HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
M.G.PRIYADARSINI, J
Smt. G.Varalaxmi – Appellant
Versus
Mende Sunil Kumar Yadav – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20.11.2018 in O.S.No.30 of 2014 (hereinafter will be referred as ‘impugned judgment’) passed by the learned VI Additional District Judge at Siddipet (hereinafter will be referred as ‘trial Court’), the defendant No.2 preferred the present appeal to set aside the impugned judgment.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter are referred to as they are arrayed before the trial Court.
3. The brief facts of the case, which necessitated the appellant to file the present appeal, are as follows:
a) The plaintiff filed O.S.No.30 of 2014 against defendant Nos.1 and 2 seeking specific performance of agreement of sale – cum- GPA and to declare the registered sale deed bearing document No.6153 of 2014 dated 08.05.2014 as null and void and not binding on the plaintiff and for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaintiff in respect of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.4.24 guntas in Sy.No.61 of Brahmanpally Village, Toopran Mandal, Medak District (hereinafter will be referred as suit schedule property). The brief averments of the plaint are as under:
i) Defenda
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.