SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 22506

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
T. VINOD KUMAR, J
Bhoopathi Padma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER :

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for respondents and perused the record.

2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the respondent Nos.3 to 5 are interfering with the peaceful possession of the land of the petitioner to an extent of Ac.0.09 gts. in Sy. No.234/3 situated in Pothulavai village, Kataram Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalapally District and trying to construct therein the integrated office complex without paying compensation and without following the procedure under Right to Fair Compensation, and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short ‘the Act’), which action it is contended is highly arbitrary, violative of Articles, 14, 15, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India.

3. Petitioner contends that the petitioner had purchased the subject land from one Bandam Kamalaiah, S/o Chinnanna, who in turn had purchased the subject land from the original assignment patta holder viz., Mallojula Laxmibai, W/o Ramaiah and the petitioner being a bonafide purchaser is entitled to protection in terms of Section 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Tra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top