SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 15871

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI CRIMINAL PETITION No.4851 of 2024

O R D E R:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners – A3 and A4 under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.21 of 2024 on the file of PS Raikode, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 452, 324, read with Section 34 of IPC.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief was that on 25.03.2024 at 06:00 hours, the de facto complainant came to the PS and lodged a report stating that on 25.03.2024 at about 01:00 hours in the midnight, his elder father’s sons by name Md.Fathru, Md.Mansoor, Md.Maqsood and Md.Akbar illegally trespassed into his house by breaking the house door, by keeping previous grudge in mind believing that he was the cause of their younger brother Rafi’s death and dragged him out from his house, abused him in filthy language and took him behind their younger father’s house and beat him with stones and sticks. Due to which, he sustained bleeding injuries on his head, legs, hands and other parts of the body. On seeing the incident, his mother Israth Begum and his wife Samreen Begum interfered to rescue him from their clutches. But, they beat them brutally, as such they also sustained bleeding injuries. When the police vehicle came to their village with siren, on hearing the siren they fled away. He stated that if the police did not come, they might have killed him. He informed his brother-in-law Salman over mobile phone and with his help came to the PS and lodged the report.

3. Basing on the said report, the above Crime was registered. A1 and A2 were arrested on 26.03.2024.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners – A3 and A4 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent – State.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that A3 and A4 were innocent. False allegations were made against them. A1 and A2 were enlarged on bail. The entire investigation was completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioners – A3 and A4 on anticipatory bail.

6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners stating that there were prima facie allegations made against the petitioners in the complaint that they criminally trespassed into the house of the complainant and attempted to commit the murder of the de facto complainant and his family members and caused bleeding injuries to them.

7. Perused the record.

8. Considering the contents of the complaint wherein there were prima facie allegations made against the petitioners herein that due to keeping previous grudges in mind, they trespassed into the house of the complainant and tried to kill him and also beat the complainant’s mother and wife causing bleedings injuries to them, it is considered not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners – A3 and A4.

9. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending in this petition, if any shall stand closed.

____________________ Dr. G.RADHA RANI, J Date: 30th April, 2024 Nsk.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top