HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K.SURENDER, J
M.Vidyasagar – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
1. Aggrieved by the conviction by the Special Court for the offence under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act vide judgment in C.C.No.22 of 2007 dated
29.03.2011, the present appeal is filed. 2. Briefly, the case of the prosecution is that P.W.1/ defacto complainant was a sub-contractor of electrical works. He took up the said contract work of fixing electrical transformer and electrical meters to the building ‘Aditya Homes’ at Nizamapet, Kukatpally.
The said work was completed in the month of February, 2006. After completing the work, he met the appellant, who was Additional Assistant Engineer, APCPDCL. After inspecting the work, the appellant intimated to the ADE. However, after inspection, the transformer was not charged (not given electric connection). P.W.1 went around the office of P.W.3/ADE, who informed P.W.1 that he had already instructed the appellant to charge the transformer.
However, when P.W.1 met the appellant, demand for Rs.15,000/-was made for charging the transformer. Again on 14.03.2006, P.W.1 met the appellant and the bribe amount was reduced to Rs.8,000/-.Since connection was not given to the transformer and the appellant ins
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.