COMMON ORDER:

Heard Mr. R.N. Hemendranath Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Sannapaneni Lohit, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P. No.18357 of 2024, Mr. Pasham Mohith, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P. Nos.17985 and 17993 of 2024, Mr. A. Jagan, learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies and Mr. T.P. Acharya, learned Standing Counsel for the Telangana State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited (TSCSCL).

2. These writ petitions challenge the initiation of proceedings under the Telangana Revenue Recovery Act , 1864 (hereinafter referred to as ‘R.R. Act’). The allegation of the petitioners is that the respondents issued impugned notices without following procedure laid down under the R.R. Act. Therefore, there is no need to delve into the facts of the case in detail.

3. However, brief facts in W.P. No.18357 of 2024 are as follows:

i) Petitioner Nos.9 and 10 are Partnership Firms. Family Members of some of the petitioners have floated petitioner Nos.9 and 10 firms with an object and purpose of carrying business of manufacturing and selling of rice, its allied products, co-products and by-products from the activity of parboiling, steam boiling and milling of