Back
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 3183 OF 2021 Between:
1. B. Anjaneyulu Goud, S/o Ungamaiah Goud, Aged about 55 years, Occ Busin6ss, iVo H.No.10-5-809/4tAlA Tukaram Gate, Secunderabad.
2. P. Agamaiah Goud, S/o Balaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ Business'
Fyo 18-398/1 , Mallikarjun Nagar, Malkajgiri. ,..PETITIONERS AND I Union of lndia,Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Labour Employment' New Delhi
2 . Emolovees State lnsurance Corporation, Rep by its Addl Commissioner and 'n',jlil",i""idil"Jtt"r'iii21 lirr rofi noio, Adaish lrlagar, Hyderabad-Soo 063.
3. E 6m #[o lil ro ,v t ees state lns ;u ir la hnc fe rc i"o .r -p iio l r ia sti io n c, .
'pR ,ie rap t i'b oy nit ,s H.D y'dy eD rair be ac dto -r 5- 0A 0^u 0th 6^ 3or ,ized r "iririJ.'a
4. The Recovery Officer, ESI Corporation' Hyderabad'
5 B"R. P ;'a .r 4a ;s ru "r #am il' "R i'e ed id iiy , b P itr ;i ln i;c 6ip 1a tl - vE am 'vp 'l o ry jue Ir o Bf u S sc So tt ois ph 'p So au in nd ik pa n u d ri' Funpub Secunderabad.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 at the Constitution of lndia praying that in the the High Court may be in the affidavit filed therewith'
stated c pi lr ec au sm edst a ton c ise ss u e a Writ' Order or direction' preferably one in the nature of Writ of declaring the action of the Respondent No 3 in issuing two notices Mandamus 1-01-2021 and No TS/lNS
102'Dt'1 No.TS/INS-ll/52000292880001 for recovery of O"t'-Ot'-.2O" to the 4rh Respondent
11t52oo02g288000't't02'
45 C to 45 lof the ESI Act' 1948 (As Amended)'
under Section contribution and Rs'2'25'5461 plus interest 12% pa' from 21-09-2009 Claim of Rs.84,890/- by the Employees State per annum trom 2110512011 plus interest l2percentage /
lnsurance Corporation in much as from these petitioners, as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to raw, viorative of principres of naturar justice, vrorative of i Article '14 of the constitution of rndia as wefl as the provisions of Emproyees state lnsurance corporation Act and set aside the same against these Petitioners and consequenfly, suspend the operation of two notices No.TS/rNS-
'11152000292880001.102, Dt. 11-01_2021 and No.i S/|NS
1'1152000292880001102, Dr. 11-o'r-202i of the Respondent No.3, in so far as these Petitioners are concerned.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavil fired in support of the petition, the High court may b" pt"a."d to suspend the operation of two notices No.TS/rNS-H/52000292'8000
01-2021 and 1102, Dt.11_
No'TSirNS-'r 1r52ooo2g2*80oo11o2, Dt.11-01-2021 0f the Respondent No.3, in so far as these pI e s(ti It lrio un rre er lss aarree concerned' pending of the above writ petition. disposal COUNSEI f.r thE PEtitiONCr(S):SRI.
M V RAJ KUMAR GABRIEL Counsel for the Respondent : 1 SRl. G.RAJESWARA RAO Counset for the Respondent
2 TO 4: SRI G. PARANKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent
5 .........
The Court made the following:
ORDER \\
I{oYt]T,E SITI JUS'I'IC'E K. LAKSII}I \}RI'I PETITION No.3.183 O[ 2021
0lt.\t- oRDl.l{:
(i'
l leard leamed counsel for the petitioner and N1r' [)ar an Kurnar. lcarncd Standing Counsel appearing fbr respondents l. I.he petitioners herein are L,essees ol the suhicct propcn)'
and rcspondent No.5 is the owner of the subject propcrt)' i'c" prt'nlises No.l8ll3. Ambedkar Nagar, Rohini Colony, Sainikpuri Road' SecLrnderabad. Respondent Nos'2 to 4 Corporation had passed an - 45A of the Employees' State Insurancc Act'
order Llnder Section certain ar.trottnl (tor sho('Act, 1948') on 16'07'2014 assessing
19.18 No'5' Sincc they to be paid by the petitioners herein and respondent - ()lttcer No'4 Recoverl'
hal'c not paid the said amount' respondent the said l 0l'2021' Challenging dated I had issued recovery certificate writ petition'
notice, the petitioners herein have filed the present to be with the matters
3. Section - 75 of the Act' 1948 deals - 75 Court' and as per Sub-Section Insurance decicled by Employees' t a principal I r which is in dispute between ) (g) any other matte ( I and emploYcr a principal tlr between ()olporation'
and the entplover oI a person and the Corporation or betwecn emp\oyer an rmrnediatc t
\ tr illtp\rrr''t'
' r" r)i ri"r:rcdiatc 'l or tr'\abre o'n" dues :' "'
' '":'"'
:'.,-""::'::
..;..:
t^
'tt:"::..:"::::o.::'.
i.i..:t' "' ::
tect'rr'et'eble ''r.clti . ri\
or sub'sec'lion pror sicns ;:.'.:::':: " ""
:., ,:":::", in accordarrce Court lnsurance \''r tltc 1 nrtl\olees be clc'':rclcd thc presetlt shall of the same'
Act' ln vier'v of t\ris i:ious with thc pror - 75 (1 ) (g) oi the of Secti'on ambit rrrt\rin thl\s "irc mtrttet'sqLlrrc\; ,q('1. I a-i.S grantlng'
dismissed i-' accotdirrgly ril l)ctition '1. I he present W under Section -
tc file an application lrereirr liberty to tl.rc pctitioners there shall be no order as tt't f : t 1 ) (g) of thc Acr' 1 9'18 1 lowever'
I I UOSIs if any' pending in the t petitions^
the rniscellaneous As a scclttel'
Writ Petition shall stand closed SD/.B.SATYAVATHI DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER \
To l.Secretary,Unionoflndia'MinistryofLabourEmployment,NewDelhi ,"r"JR"i3:::
'*UL",Yii3,:"'3[",';:n1tff: ^T3?;'iv*]i]l?lro"""##';-'ffi3i0 I 3. Employees State lnsurance corpor ;a sti io 6n ;' , .R #e rp "' t iP6,In lt 's HD vv d eD ri are bc ato dr - sA ..u t 0h 6o 3ri 'zed officer (lnsuran"" o"n"r''T ri"':ii:
4. The Recovery Officer,, ESI Corporation' Hyderabad'
uR":,TffiHiSFEX?ls[XL?Si:fl i',"J,"I8',:'3['X'3],lf-Sld,Funpub cunderabad /. .<
6. One CC to SRl. M V RAJ KUMAR GABRTEL Advocate IOPUCI
7.
One CC to SRl. G.PARANKUMAR Ajvocate IOPUCI
8. One CC TO SRI N .RAJESARA RAO ASST S/o counsel of
9. Two CD Copies 10.One Spare CoPY IKV \
BS HIGH COURT \ DATED:07 tO6t2O2Z \ \ \ '.
ORDER (
WP.No.3I83 24
2021 trus Zaft l *
tl t-sPaici+ .a WR,T PETITION ,S DISil,ISSED
