Back
I 3168 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 666 OF 2022 Between:
1. Erla Manga, Wo.Venkat Rao
2. Erla Shiva Kumar, S/o.Venkat Rao, Occ. ffient, Presently residing at 7 marchant, Crescent, Sunshine west 3020, Victoria Australia, Represented by GPA holder, P.Naga Prasad, S/o. P. Venkateshwarlu, Occ. Pvt Employee, Plot No.83, Venus Rock Heights, Devender Nagar, Gajulramaram Village, QutbullapurMuncipal Circle, GHMC, Medchal-Malkajgiri District Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 AND '1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
2. A.Swaroopa, Wo.A.Prabhakar Reddy, O2c. House Wife, R/o.Block No.129, Room No.22. Rajiv Gruhakalpa, Surarafn Colony, Qutbulapur, Medchal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.
RespondenUCom plainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.51 of 2019 on the file of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at LB Nagar for;offence under Section 323, 420 ol lPC, 'Depositors Section 5 of The Telangana Protection of of Financial Establishments Act, 1999 and Section 76 of Chit Fund Act against the petitioners herein.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and uponlearing the arguments of Sri HUSSAIN AAMIR, Advocate for the Petitioners, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent No.1 and Sri S. Manoj, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following.
/
ORDER:
This petition is filed to quash the proceedings against the petitioners-
accused in C.C.No.51 of 2019, pending. on the file of MetropolitEn Sessions L.B.Nagar.
Judge, Cyberabad at /-
The offences alleged against the petitioners herein are under Sections
323 and 420 of IPC and Section 5 of the Protection of Depositors-Funds Act and Section 76 of Chit Funds Act.
This Court directed the Public Prosecutor to get specific instructions with regard to number of victims in the present crime. ln the charge sheet itself, there is specific mention that initially, L.W.6 i.e., Satyanarayana Raju was the member of the chit and he has discontinued'the said chit, Thereafter, on his request, the petitioner herein have permitted the 2nd respondent as member of the chit. Thus, as per the instructions of the Public Prosecutor and as per the contents of the charge sheet, the 2nd respondent is the only victim.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that during pendency of the above petition, the petitioners and the 2nd respondent have entered into compromise and the 2nd respondent has filed l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2022 to permit them to compound the offences and to compromise the matter.
In view of the above, the petitioners and the 2nd respondent are directed to appear before the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Gommittee, for their identification and on completion of the same, the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee shall submit a report by 20.04.2022.
compromise'.
List on 20.04.2022 under the caption 'for JJ, SD/. M. MANJULA ASSISTANtr REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
secrraf6rrrcen To, '1. The Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad (By Spl. Messenge0
2. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court at Hyderabad
3. A.Swaroopa, Wo.A.Prabhakar Reddy, Occ.House Wife, R/o.Block No.129, Room No.22. Rajiv Gruhakalpa, Suraram Colony, Qutbulapur, Medchal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. (by RPAD)
4.
One CC to SRI HUSSAIN AAMIR Advocate IOPUC]
//
(OPUC
5. One CC to Sri S. Manoj, Advocate
6. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at H erabad. (OUT)
7. One spare copy
HIGH COURT KL,J DATED:0710412022 List on 20.04.2022 under the caption 'for compromise'
ORDER CRLP.No.666 of 2022 :,3i t'Lct'1"(
0 t
11 [l$
*
DIRECTION {
