SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 410

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
Sale Ramulamma Gaddam Ramulamma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.37373 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:learned counsel for the petitioner
For the Respondents: learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue

An application in prescribed format is essential for considering claims under tenancy legislation.

Headnote:This case addresses the issuance of an ownership certificate under Section 38E of the Telangana Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The petitioner claims to be a protected tenant and seeks appropriate orders for the consideration of her pending application for the certificate. The court finds that it is obligatory for the petitioner to apply in the prescribed format to initiate the process. Nevertheless, the court does not express any opinion on the merit of entitlement regarding the ownership certificate. The petitioner is permitted to submit the application within two weeks, with a directive for timely consideration by the respondents.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim as protected tenant. (Para 2 , 3)
2. obligatory application format for ownership certificate. (Para 4)
3. directive for timely consideration of application. (Para 5)

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that she is the protected tenant of land admeasuring Acs.25.18 gts situated in Survey No.443 of Tangutoor Village, Shankarpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and she also claims to have been in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said extent of land. The petitioner also claims to have approached the revenue authorities by submitting representations dated 13.07.2022 and 16.08.2022 to grant patta certificate in respect of the said extent of land under Section 38E of Telangana Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 , but said application is still pending consideration before the respondents and hence seeks appropriate orders directing the respondents to consider the said application submitted by the petitioner for issuance of ownership certificate under Section 38E of Telangana Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 .

3. A perusal of the material on record shows that the grandson of the petitioner herein have submitted a representation dated 16.08.2022 before respondent No.4 herein claiming that the petitioner herein was recorded as protected tenant in respect of the said land in Survey No.443, but she was not issued ownership certificate under Section 38E of Telangana Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 , and requested for issuance of such ownership certificate in the name of the petitioner herein.

4. The present Writ Petition is filed complaining non consideration of the said representation said to have been submitted by the grandson of the petitioner herein. Under the facts and circumstances of the case , this Court is of the considered view that in order to claim the issuance of ownership certificate under Section 38E of Telangana Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 , it is obligatory on the part of the petitioner to submit the application in the prescribed format before respondent No.4 herein. In the absence of any such application submitted by the petitioner in the prescribed format, the question of directing respondent No.3 to consider the said representation or application submitted by the grandson of the petitioner does not arise.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions made on either side, the Writ Petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit an application for grant of ownership certificate under Section 38E of Telangana Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on submission of such application, respondent No.4 herein shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon by affording an opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned within a period of three (3) months from the date of submission of such application by the petitioner.

5. It is further made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement or disentitlement of the petitioner herein for grant of ownership certificate in respect of the subject land and it is for the respondent No.4 to consider the same on its own merits.

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top