SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO: 33844 OF 2018 Between:

Bandari Educational Society, H.No.13-6-463/A/2, Kuslumpura, Kanrvan, Hyderabad Rep

1 by its Secretary Mr.B.Venkatesh

2 B'andari Sriniv-as lnstitute of Technology, Gollapally Village, Chevella lvlandal Ranga Reddy District Rep by its Correspondent B.Venkatesl)

J B.Verikatesh, S/o B.Srinivas, Aged about 38 years, R/o H. No. 13-6'4631N2' Kuslumpura, Hyderabad Karuvan'

...pETrroNERS AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education

1 Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

2 Th6 Telangana State Council foi Higher Education, Rep by its Secretary lvlasab Tank, Hvderabad The Convenor, TS-EAIVCET- 2018 (Admissions), Sankethika Vidya Bhavan, l\r]asabtank'

Hyderabad.

4 The Jawaharlal Nehru technological university, Represented by its Registrar, Kukatpally, HYderabad ...RESP.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in rejecting the request of the petitioners to ratify the admission of out of state students admitted to the 2nd Petitioner institution in Engineering Course for the academic year 20l B-19 as being illegal, arbitrary unconstitutiona I and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith ratify and approve the admissions out of state students listed in Annexure P-1 whose admission was rejected by the 3rd respondent and admitted in the 2nd petitioner institution under the left over vacant seats (spot admissions) category and treat the said admissions as valid for all purposes 'l IA NO: OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the aff idavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner institution to impart training in Engineering Course in their respective branches including issuance of hall tickets, appearance in the examjnations and declaration of results to the said out of state students listed in Annexure P-1 whose admission was rejected by the 3rd respondent, pending the disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P. PANDU RANGA REDDY Counsel for Respondent No. 1: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4: SRI V. RAMCHANDER GOUO The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETtTtON No.33844 of 2018 /

ORDER:

When the motter is token up for heoring, counsel oppeoring for the petitioners hos informed the Court thot in view of the interlocutory orders possed by this Court on 19.09,201g, the grievonce of the petiiioners hos been resolved ond no further orders need be possed in this writ petition. However, counsel contended thoi if the petitioners could noi complete their Course within the stipuloted lime, they moy be permitted to complete their Course in occordonce with the Rules.

This Court, hoving considered the obove submissions, is of the considered view thot the couse in the writ petition does not survive ond the wril petition is, occordingly, closed. However, it is mode cleor thot if the pelilioners hove not compleied their course rill now, ihey moy be permitted lo complete their Course in occordonce wiih the Rules. No order os to costs.

Pending miscelloneous petitions, if ony, sholl stond closed.

SD/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'

bo SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru technological University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad

2. One CCto Sri P Pandu Ranga ReddyAdvocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to GP For Higher Education, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri V. Ramchander Goud, Advocate (OPUC)

5. Two CD Copies 6. One spare copy MBC

d.{ NS

HIGH COURT DATED: 1610612021 ,.t sTAr€

1 c 13 JUt$n o ORDER WP.No.33844 of 2018 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top