SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
SMT.SOMU SUGUNA – Appellant
Versus
KRANTHI KUMAR S.I. OF POLICE MIRYALAGUDA I TOWN – Respondent


ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (for short'Cr.P.C''), by the petitioner/accused seeking to quash the proceedings against her in Crime No.68 of 2013 on the file of Miryalaguda I Town PS, Nalgonda, registered for the offences punishable under Sections

202, 290 and 506 IPC.

2.

Heard the learned coun5el for both sides and perused the record.

3.

The learned counsel for petitioner/accused would submit that ttrough the offences alleged against the petitioner/accused are non-cognizable offences, the S.H.O Miryalaguda I Town PS, erroneously issued the First Information Report in Crime No.68 of 2013 under Section 154 Cr.P.C. It is also contended that there is no information to constitute any cognizable offence. In the given circumstances of the case, the S.H,O, Miryalaguda i Town PS, ought not have registered the FIR and proceeded with investigation and ultimately prayed to allow the criminal petition and quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Crime No.6B of 2013 on the file of Miryalaguda I Town pS, Nalgonda, registered For the offences under Sections 202, 290 and 506 IPC.

4.

On the other hand, the learned Additional Pub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top