SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 1624

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, JJ
PURNIMA RANI KAIJAM – Appellant
Versus
BALAJI ANKEM – Respondent


HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY I.A.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2019 IN/AND F.C.A.No.204 of 2017 Date: 23.04.2019 Between:

Purnima Rani Kaijam ...Appellant and Balaji Ankem ...Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Mrs. Deepika Gadde Counsel for the respondent: Mr.Katta Shiva Kumar Mr. Balaji Ankem (party-in-person)

The Court made the following:

Common Judgment:

(per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)

Mrs.Purnima Rani Kanijam, the appellant, and Mr.Balaji Ankem, the respondent, are present before this Court. Both of them have submitted their Aadhar cards before this Court in order to establish their respective identities. They have also been identified by their respective counsel.

Both the parties are ad idem that they have entered into Compromise. They filed I.A.No.1 of 2019 to record the compromise in terms of the compromise Memo, and to set aside the order and decree dated 16.05.2017, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, in F.C.O.P.No.1500 of 2013; I.A.No.2 of 2019 to permit them to amend the prayer in the appeal;

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top