ORDER :

Heard Sri V. Ravinder Rao, Senior Counsel for Sri Sourabh Agarwal, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Vedula Venkataramana, learned senior counsel for Sri B. Chandrasen Reddy, for respondents 1 and 2.

2. This Revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dt.10.04.2019 in E.A. No.500 of 2019 in E.P. No.1529 of 2018 in PLC No.81 of 2007 in O.S. No.278 of 2004 of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

3. The petitioner herein is Judgment Debtor No.33.

The Suit O.S.No.278 of 2004

4. O.S. No.278 of 2004 was filed by respondents 1 and 2/Decree holders against respondents 3 to 34 who were represented by petitioner as General Power of Attorney holder. The said suit was filed for specific performance of an agreement of sale dt.07.11.1996 executed by respondents 3 to 34 through the petitioner in favour of respondents 1 and 2 by executing a registered sale deed in favour of the respondents 1 and 2 or their nominees, for possession of the suit schedule property or in the alternative to direct the respondents 3 to 34 to pay to respondents 1 and 2 Rs.2.5 crores towards damages.

5. The plaint schedule property in the said suit was described as und