Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SUJANA, J
Dinesh Kumar Mundra – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing proceedings due to lack of evidence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observation on the implications and evidence. (Para 4 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments by the petitioner regarding no involvement. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final decision to quash proceedings. (Para 9) |
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.14 in Crime No.33 of 2024 of Cyber Crime Police Station, TSCSB (TS Cyber Security Bureau), registered for the offences punishable under Sections
318, 319 and 338 of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act – 2008.
2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent No.2/de facto complainant on 21.10.2024 lodged a complaint before the Cyber Crime Police Station alleging online financial fraud amounting to Rs.8,14,98,621/-. He stated that in July 2024, he received a WhatsApp message from one Melanie Lyons (SIG Group) and joined a group named "SIG Trading," where trading tips and IPO-related information were shared. He further stated that he was influenced by the group admins, including Eric Robertson and Melanie Lyons, joined a fake trading app named "RK Global" and was added to a customer care group and that he was lured into inv
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
