Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J
Prafulla Kumar Prasanna – Appellant
Versus
Union of India. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of counsel for petitioners and counsel for respondents. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. interim orders compliance and reference to previous judgments. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. general conclusion on allowing writ petitions and costs. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
COMMON ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel Mrs. N.V.R. Rajyalakshmi, representing the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, for the respondents and perused the material made available on the record. With the consent of both the learned counsel, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal.
2. In all these writ petitions, interim directions were issued to restore the Director Identification Number (DIN) of the petitioners, who are Directors in active companies.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that pursuant to the interim orders passed by this Court, the Director Identification Number (DIN) of the petitioners was restored and interim orders of this Court are complied with. Subsequently, this Court vide common order dated 11.10.2018 passed in W.P. No.17409 of 2018 and batch disposed of several writ petitions making the interim orders in the writ petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
