Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
B. Gopalakrishna – Appellant
Versus
A.P. Grameena Vikas Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal leads to a break in service for pension considerations. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 2. the ruling on the implication of reinstatement on pension calculations. (Para 3) |
| 3. nature of grievances related to dismissal and pension rights. (Para 4 , 5) |
O R D E R:
It is the case of petitioner that while he was working in respondent bank, he was convicted and sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment in a Criminal Complaint (CC) No. 28 of 1992 under Section 498A IPC. by learned I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Narsapur. Aggrieved by the sentence, he is stated to have preferred Criminal Appeal No. 187 of 1995 on the file of learned Sessions Judge, West Godavari Division at Eluru. Pending Appeal, sentence of imprisonment was suspended vide Crl.M.P.No. 1757 of 1995 dated 09.11.1995. Consequent to conviction, petitioner was dismissed from bank's service on 04.01.1996 as per Regulation 29(3) (a) of Chapter-4 of Manjeera Grameena Bank Staff Regulations, 1983 read with Section 10 (1)(b)(i) of Banking Regulation Act , 1949. Petitioner challenged the above said order of dismissal by filing Writ Petition No. 704 of 1996 during pendency of Criminal Appeal filed by him. The sa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
