Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N. TUKARAMJI, J
Seeloju Shiva Kumar Chary – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments regarding necessity and implications of vehicle seizure. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner's ownership and financial reliance on the vehicle. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court's reasoning on interim custody and prosecuting obligations. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 4. arguments around the vehicle's impact on financial stability and legal standing. (Para 7) |
| 5. court's final ruling to allow custody of the vehicle. (Para 9) |
ORDER
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter ‘the BNSS ’), seeking to set aside the docket order dated 19.03.2025 passed in Crl.M.P. No. 216 of 2025 in Crime No. 1041 of 2024 by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special (Mobile) PCR Act-cum-IV Additional Judicial Magistrate-cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar. The petitioner further prays for a direction to the trial Court to grant interim custody of the vehicle, a Maruti Swift Dzire bearing Registration No. TS 08 HF 4796.
2. I have heard Mr. Kasoju Mahesh Chary, learned counsel, representing Mr. Seeloju Shiva Kumar Chary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Addition
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
