SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 11691

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Mohammad Ameenuddin – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Yousufuddin – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1811 OF 2025

ORDER

Heard Sri Mirza Azharulla Baig, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. In compliance with the order dated 20.06.2024, learned counsel for the petitioners has filed proof of service vide memo USR No.60590, dated 25.06.2025. Despite Service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent.

3. This revision is filed under Article 227 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 03.02.2025 passed in I.A.(SR) No.23 of 2022 in O.S.No.756 of 2021 by the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagr.

4. Respondent herein/plaintiff has filed the aforesaid suit against the petitioners herein/defendants for perpetual injunction. During pendency of the said suit, petitioners filed I.A.No.23 of 2022 in O.S.No.756 of 2021 under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC to reject the said plaint on the ground that there is no cause of action in the plaint. The respondent herein has suppressed about earlier suit vide O.S.No.56 of 2018 filed for declaration of title and recovery of possession of suit schedule property therein and misrepresented that the said suit was decreed. The said suit was actually dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top