SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 12334

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J. SREENIVAS RAO, J
petitioner/accused No.1 – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Criminal Petition | Crime No.63 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Srinivasa Swarpu
For the Respondents: Mr.Syed Yasar Mamoon

Anticipatory bail provisions require cooperation with investigations under the stipulated legal framework.

Headnote:This judgment addresses a Criminal Petition for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, regarding Crime No.63 of 2025. The Acused is directed to appear before the investigation officer by 24.07.2025, and must cooperate during the investigation as per established legal procedures. The court emphasizes adherence to proper investigative protocols as prescribed in the Criminal Procedure Code and relevant statutes, ultimately disposing of the petition in favor of the conditions set forth, thus allowing the progression of the case.

Table of Content
1. facts leading to the anticipatory bail application (Para 1 , 2)
2. nature of offences and potential penalties (Para 3)
3. court's directives for investigation and cooperation (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. final ruling and closure of the petition (Para 7)

Order:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused No.1, seeking anticipatory bail under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ), in connection with Crime No.63 of 2025 on the file of Adavi Mutharam Police Station, Jayashankar Bhupalpally, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 350(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act , 15(1) of Environment Protection Act, 1968 and Section 29(1) (c), 29(1)(D) of Indian Insecticides Act, 1968 .

2. Heard Mr.Srinivasa Swarpu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1/State.

3. During the course of hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the offences leveled against the petitioner are punishable with an imprisonment of less than seven years.

4. In view of the same, without going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to appear before the investigation officer on or before 24.07.2025. On such appearance of the petitioner, the investigation officer is directed to scrupulously follow the procedure contemplated under Section 41-A of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.)/Section 35(3) of BNSS and the guidelines issued by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar , [1(2014) 8 SCC 273]

5. It is made clear that the petitioner/accused No.1 shall cooperate with the investigation officer for the investigation and make himself available to him as and when required and also provide the information/

documents as sought by him to conclude the investigation.

6. If the petitioner/accused No.1 fails to cooperate with the investigation officer for investigation, the investigation officer is at liberty to take action against him in accordance with law.

7. Subject to the above directions, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top