Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J
Cheva Mallaiah – Appellant
Versus
Singareni Collieries Company Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks release of withheld gratuity based on statutory rights. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the withholding and entitlement of gratuity. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court affirms gratuity as a constitutional right and critiques withholding policies. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final directive to release gratuity within specified timelines. (Para 14 , 15) |
COMMON ORDER:
2. Heard Sri P.Achut Rama Shastry, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/ respondents and Sri P.Sri Harsha Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Singareni Collieries Company Limited appearing on behalf of the respondents/ petitioner.
“….to issue Writ or Direction more Particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.1 to 3 in not considering the Petitioner application dated 29-7-2022 for settling the arrears and gratuity etc, and disconnection of electricity connection and water facility threatening him to vacate the quarters by Respondent Company is against to the Article 14 and 21 of the constitution, and Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent Authorities to pay arrears, benefits and gratuity to the P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
