Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J
Defendant No.1 – Appellant
Versus
Plaintiff – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed challenging trial court order. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments presented on applicability of interrogatories. (Para 2 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's observations on interrogatories and trial procedures. (Para 3 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 14) |
ORDER:
This revision petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 11.01.2024 passed by the XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I.A.No.514 of 2023 in O.S.No.109 of 2023.
2. Heard Sri Aadesh Varma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T.Sharath, learned counsel for respondent No.1. It is endorsed in the affidavit that respondent Nos.2 to 8 are not necessary parties to this Revision Petition. Perused the entire material available on record.
3. The petitioner herein is defendant No.1 and respondent No.1 is plaintiff in the suit before the trial Court.
4. The brief facts of the case that are relevant for adjudication of the present revision are that the respondent No.1 filed a suit vide O.S.No.109 of 2023 against the revision petitioner and respondent Nos.2 to 8 for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the suit A and B schedule properties; and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
