Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J
plaintiff – Appellant
Versus
defendant Nos.1 to 4 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims of possession and ownership dispute. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 2. confirmation of the trial and appellate findings regarding evidence. (Para 12 , 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. appellant's argument on misinterpretation of law and facts. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. confirmation of the dismissal of the second appeal. (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT:
The Second Appeal is filed seeking to set aside the judgment and decree dated 28.01.2025 in A.S.No.85 of 2018 on the file of the learned VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad wherein and whereunder, the judgment and decree dated 27.03.2017 in O.S.No.788 of 2006 on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar was confirmed.
2. Heard Mr.M.Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellant. Perused the record.
3. The appellant herein is plaintiff, respondent Nos.1 to 4 are defendant Nos.1 to 4 in the suit. For convenience, hereinafter the parties are referred to as they were arrayed in the suit.
4. The brief facts of the case, which led to the filing of the present Second Appeal, are that the plaintiff filed Suit vide O.S.No.788 of 2006 on the file of the learned I Additi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
