SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 12918

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N. TUKARAMJI, J
Mohd. Akram – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6980 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Y.Bala Murali
For the Respondents: Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla

Previous legal decisions can quash ongoing proceedings if they directly contradict current allegations, especially concerning banned products.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 528 - Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 - Section 20(2) - Consideration for quashing criminal proceedings against sole accused involved in the sale of banned tobacco products - Previous judgment of Coordinate Bench quashing similar proceedings relied upon - Proceedings deemed unsustainable in light of existing legal directives. (Paras 9, 10, 13, and 14)

(B) Criminal Procedures - Scope of quashing - Court can quash proceedings when earlier decisions set legal precedent for the current case as seen herein. (Paras 10, 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, the sole accused, is involved in selling banned tobacco products valued at Rs.4,50,000/-, with earlier proceedings quashed due to contrary High Court rulings on similar offenses.

Findings of Court:
The Criminal Petition is allowed, quashing the ongoing proceedings due to lack of legal support for the charges.

Issues: The main issue is the contradiction between current allegations and prior legal rulings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that previous judgments regarding similar offenses supported the quashing of proceedings against the petitioner.

Result: The Criminal Petition is allowed.

Table of Content
1. details of the tobacco possession case and earlier judicial relief. (Para 1 , 2 , 8 , 9)
2. court observations aligning contemporary case details with prior rulings. (Para 3 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. quashing of illegal possession and sale of banned products. (Para 4)
4. arguments regarding the necessity of facing charges versus seeking quashment. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS , 2023’) seeking quashment of the proceedings, against the petitioner in Crime No.234 of 2025 of Pahadishareef Police Station, Rachakond.

2. The petitioner is sole accused in Crime No.234 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 20 (2) of the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 (for short ‘COTPA’) and Sections 272 and 275 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNS , 2023’).

3. Heard Mr. Y.Bala Murali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondents.

4. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the petitioner/accused is involved in selling and purchasing the banned Tobacco products and the Police concerned seized the said Tobacco products worth of Rs.4,50,000/-.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide Criminal Petition Nos.3731 and Batch quashed the proceedings against the petitioners therein by passing common order dated

27.08.2018. He further submits that the 2nd respondent has registered the present crime in violation of the orders passed by this Court. Hence, prayed for quashment of the proceedings against the petitioner in the crime.

6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has to face either investigation or trial and prove his innocence and instead of doing so, he has filed the present criminal petition, which cannot be considered at this stage.

7. I have perused the materials on record.

8. As per the prosecution, on 29.04.2025 at 11:15 hours, the complainant/ Sub Inspector of Police lodged a complaint stating that the petitioner was found in possession of a large quantity of Government banned tobacco products. Accordingly, the complainant and his staff apprehended the petitioner and seized tobacco products 1)Sagar tobacco-14,000(Sachets), 2) Sagar Pan Masala-14,000 (Sachets), 3) Miraz Tobacco-219 (Sachets), 4) RR Tobacco-10500 (Sachets), 5) RR Pan Masala-10500 (Sachets), 6) Shikar Tobacco-9450 (Sachets), 7) Kamala Pasand Tobacco-19200 (Sachets), 8) Kamala Pasand Tobacco-19,200 sachets, 9) Kamala Pasand Pan Masala- 19,200 sachets, 10) Raj Niwas Tobacco-28,800 sachets, 11) Raj Niwas Pan) V-1 Tobacco-27,000 sachets, 15) Vimal Pan Masala- 27,000 sachets, 16) Baba Nauratan Pan Masala-14,400 sachets, 17) 24 Carrat Pan masala- 10,000 sachets, 18) Pan Bahar Pan Masala-1000 sachets, 19) Swagath Tobacco-650 sachets, which were total worth of Rs.4,50,000/- under cover of panchanama.

9. The related Notification No.501/FSS/I/2022 dated 07.01.2022,prohibiting manufacturing, storing, distribution, transportation and sale of gutka and pan masala in the entire State of Telangana,has been stayed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Shri Venkateshwara Traders v. State of Telangana and others videSLA No.20441 of 2021 with SLP(C) No.1656 of 2022. Thereafter, the Director General of Police, Telangana State issued Circular Memorandum in RC.No.295/R1-NS/2022 with directions to the Station House Officers not to interfere with the business activities, who carry out the business as per rules of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India and also not to take any coercive measures against the tobacco traders as long as the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court is in force.

10. Having regard to this factual position, a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Crl.P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top