Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J
defendant No.2 – Appellant
Versus
plaintiff Nos.2 to 4 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case initiation and ownership claims. (Para 2) |
| 2. ownership claims based on documented sales. (Para 3 , 9) |
| 3. contest of ownership between plaintiffs and defendants. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. lower courts established prior ownership through registered deeds. (Para 10) |
| 5. disputed ownership necessitates injunction. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. appellant's failure to identify substantial legal questions. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. second appeal limited to substantial questions of law. (Para 16 , 18) |
| 8. limitations of second appeals under cpc. (Para 17 , 19) |
JUDGMENT:
Challenging the validity and legality of the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2024 in A.S.No.92 of 2022 passed by the Principal District Judge, Kamareddy, confirming the judgment and decree dated 15.11.2022 in O.S.No.8 of 2014 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Kamareddy, the present Second Appeal is filed.
2. The appellant herein is the defendant No.2 and the respondents herein are the plaintiff Nos.2 to 4 in the suit. For convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.
3. The facts of the case in brief, which led to filing of the present Second Appeal, are that the plaintiff No.1 filed a suit in O.S.No.8 of 2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
