Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO, JJ
M/s Pavani Estates – Appellant
Versus
B. Chennamma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding interim relief and petitions' subject matter. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding undertakings by respondents. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. temporary resolution of disputes through undertakings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. binding nature of the order. (Para 8) |
| 5. final decision to dispose of the petitions. (Para 9 , 10) |
COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)
The Award-debtor has filed two Civil Revision Petitions from orders dated 18.06.2025 and 19.06.2025 refusing to extend the interim order passed by the learned Commercial Court in favour of the Award-debtor on 13.06.2025.
2. The facts which are relevant for the present orders are that the impugned Award dated 04.12.2023 was passed in the Award Debtor’s application for stay of the Award under Section
36 (2) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 .
3. On 13.06.2025, the Award-debtor was granted limited protection till 16.06.2025 on alienation of the schedule property. This interim order was subsequently extended till 18.06.2025. Thereafter, on 18.06.2025 and 19.06.2025, the Commercial Court declined to extend the interim protection on the ground that the Court was already considering the applicatio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
