Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
P. SAM KOSHY, NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, JJ
M/s Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Vari Devasthanam – Appellant
Versus
Assessment Unit – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments from both parties on the adequacy of the response time. (Para 1 , 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. insufficient response time violates natural justice. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court mandates adherence to procedural standards. (Para 7 , 12) |
| 4. court quashes the assessment order due to procedural violations. (Para 10 , 14) |
| 5. final ruling in favor of the petitioner. (Para 15) |
(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr. A.V.A. Siva Kartikeya, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Vijhay K. Punna, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department appearing for the respondents.
2. The instant is a petition which has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying the Court to declare the Assessment Order in DIN: ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2024-25/1074359177(1), dated 11.03.2025, passed by respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2023- 24 under Section 143 (3) read with Section 144 B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as illegal, void-ab-initio, violative of the principles of natural justice and being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India; and also to set aside the show-cause notice on the proposed variati
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
