SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 14301

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J. SREENIVAS RAO, J
Mangalikuntla Venuvardhan Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.Haripreeth
For the Respondents: Mr.Syed Yasar Mamoon

Judgement Key Points

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

Criminal Revision Petition No. _ of 2025

In the matter of: A revision under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 (BNSS), filed by the State of Karnataka [Represented by the Public Prosecutor] challenging the Bail Order dated _ passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, [Name of District], in Criminal Case No. _ of 2025.

Versus

M/s. [Name of Accused/Defendant], S/o [Father's Name], R/o [Address], [City/District] – Petitioner/Accused


RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH:

1. Introduction That the present Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as "the BNSS") seeking to quash the impugned Bail Order (!) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate in the under-mentioned case: * Case No: Criminal Case No. _ of 2025 * Police Station: [Name of Police Station] * District: [District Name] * Offences: Offences punishable under Section [Insert Section Numbers] of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 (BNS) (!) .

2. Facts of the Case 2.1. The facts of the case are that on [Date of Incident], a registered complaint was lodged against the Petitioner alleging grievous bodily harm and assault (!) . The prosecution case reveals that the victim sustained severe injuries, including three grievous injuries, as corroborated by the medical certificate issued by [Name of Hospital] dated [Date] (!) .

2.2. The incident occurred amidst a dispute regarding property/land admeasuring [Area], where the accused allegedly assaulted the complainant using weapons such as a hoe and sticks (!) . The nature of the allegations involves serious violence resulting in grievous hurt, attracting stringent provisions of the penal law (!) .

3. The Impugned Bail Order 3.1. Despite the gravity of the allegations and the ongoing investigation, the learned Judicial Magistrate granted bail to the accused in Criminal Case No. _ of 2025 (!) . In doing so, the Court relied on the circumstances of the accused, noting their lack of criminal antecedents and willingness to cooperate (!) .

3.2. The impugned order was passed under Section 482 of the BNSS (!) , granting bail subject to conditions such as surrender before the Station House Officer and execution of a personal bond (!) . The Court also directed the accused not to influence witnesses or interfere with the investigation (!) .

4. Grounds for Revision 4.1. Perversity and Error of Law: The impugned Bail Order is perverse and erroneous in law. The allegations against the accused are specific and serious, involving grievous bodily harm (!) . Granting bail at this stage, while the investigation is still in progress, creates a high probability of tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses (!) .

4.2. Severity of Offence: The offences alleged are of a heinous nature. The medical evidence confirms that the victim suffered grievous injuries (!) . The Court below failed to adequately weigh the severity of the allegations and the potential impact on the investigation process (!) .

4.3. Public Interest: It is in the public interest to ensure that a criminal who has allegedly caused grievous harm does not remain at large during the pendency of the investigation. The grant of bail undermines the faith of the public in the administration of justice (!) .

4.4. Misappreciation of Evidence: The Court below placed undue emphasis on the accused's willingness to cooperate (!) while ignoring the specific and grave nature of the assault described in the police complaint and supported by medical evidence (!) . The distinction made between civil disputes and criminal assault was not upheld in the bail order (!) .

5. Prayer In view of the foregoing facts and grounds, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: a) Allow this Criminal Revision Petition under Section 528 of the BNSS; b) Set aside and quash the impugned Bail Order dated _ passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate; c) Direct the learned Judicial Magistrate to reject the bail application or impose stricter conditions, including the surrender of the accused immediately; and d) Pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

Place: Bangalore Date: [Date]

Advocate for the State [Name of Advocate] [Enrollment Number] [Address]


CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, certify that I have gone through the grounds of this petition and that the same are of legal importance and involve a question of law of general public importance.

Advocate for the State


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.7478 and 7479 of 2025

COMMON ORDER:

Since these criminal petitions are arising out of Crime No.48 of

2025, these criminal petitions are heard together and disposed of by this common order.

2. These Criminal Petitions are filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 in Crime No.48 of 2025 on the file of Nawabpet Police Station, Vikarabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 118(2) and 127(2) r/w 3(5)

of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’).

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 03.04.2025 at 1100 hours, the de-facto complainant lodged a complaint in which he stated that he has a son and a daughter, both married. His son frequently quarreled with him, demanding that he register 21 guntas of land, currently in the complainant’s name, to him and repay the bank loan of Rs.30,000/- on the land. On 02.03.2025 at about 10 PM, his son, along with son-in-law and daughter-in-law, assaulted him while he was sleeping. They beat him with a hoe and sticks, and daughter-in-law threw chili powde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top