Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SARATH, J
Inuganti Rama Venkata Prasanth Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to registration refusal based on property regularization. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. dispute over government certification received. (Para 5) |
| 3. court supports the necessity to consider regularization in registration. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. impugned refusal order must be set aside. (Para 8) |
| 5. finalization of writ petition leading to registration. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for stamps and registration appearing for the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that questioning the Intimation of Refusal Order issued by the respondent No.3-Joint Sub-Registrar-I vide Refusal Order No.27/2024/RO(OB) dated 23.01.2024, which is for refusing to register the Gift Settlement Deed document No.12 of 2024 executed by the mother of the petitioner with respect to the House bearing No.1- 65/2/114 (PTIN No.1219985247), Plot No.114, in Sy.Nos.12, 12/A & 13 admeasuring 233.33 Sq. Yards situated at Guttala Begumpet Village, Serilingampally Mandal under GHMC Chandanagar Circle-21, Ranga Reddy District, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
