IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
T. VINOD KUMAR, J
Mohammed Jaffar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of police misconduct and illegal detention (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. police response to complaints against petitioners (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. court directive for notice under law (Para 12) |
| 4. conclusion and disposal of the writ petition (Para 13 , 14) |
O R D E R
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4, and with their consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.
2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the writ petition and the nature of lis involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.5 to 10 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.
3. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is that the 5th respondent in discharge of his official duties of the 4th respondent-police station is calling the petitioners to police station regularly and illegally detaining them in the said police station from morning till evening and insisting them to issue blank cheques and also submit property papers, at the behest of respondent Nos.7 to 10, which action of the respondents-authorities it is contended as highly ill
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.