IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
T. VINOD KUMAR, J
Bindi Sudhama Prithviraj Goud – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
O R D E R
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 and perused the record. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner in brief is that though, a case vide Cr.No.109/2025 is registered against the petitioner herein by arraying him as Accused No.1 therein, the respondent authorities have issued notice dated 21-06-2025 under Section 94 /179 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ') calling upon him to appear before the 4th respondent along with original unregistered Will deed made and executed by late Smt.Kousalya in his favour on 25-05-2022 as being illegal, arbitrary and also contrary to the decision of this Court dated 31-03-2021 in W.P.No.7333 of 2021, with a consequential direction to respondent Nos.3 and 4 to proceed with the investigation in Cr.No.109/2025 in fair and unbiased manner.
3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the 4th respondent by impugned notice has called upon the petitioner to produce the ori
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.