SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 15028

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUJOY PAUL, CJ, G.RADHA RANI, J
M/s. SPIKE TECHNOLOGIES – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

(per Hon’ble SP,J)

In this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners have called in question the legality, validity and propriety of notification Nos.13/2022, dated 05.07.2022, 9 and 56/2023, dated 31.03.2023 and 28.12.2023, respectively. The pari materia/ corresponding notification Nos.118/2023, dated 25.08.2023 and 170/2023, dated 17.12.2023 issued by State of Telangana are also subject matter of challenge. These notifications are admittedly issued in purported exercise of power under Section 168A of The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, ‘the GST Act’).

Factual background and Contention of the petitioners:

2. The facts are taken from W.P. No. 33390 of 2024. Sri S. Ravi, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri P. Venkata Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that this matter relates to F.Y. 2019-2020. The show-cause notice was issued on 31.05.2024. The Order-in-Original (‘OIO’) was passed on 29.08.2024 after the maximum period of limitation prescribed under Section 73(10) of the GST Act. Under the garb of extension of limitation as per impugned notifications, said OIO came to be passed. Criticizing the impugned notification Nos. 9 and 56 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top