IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUJOY PAUL, CJ, G.RADHA RANI, J
M/s. SPIKE TECHNOLOGIES – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax – Respondent
COMMON ORDER
(per Hon’ble SP,J)
In this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners have called in question the legality, validity and propriety of notification Nos.13/2022, dated 05.07.2022, 9 and 56/2023, dated 31.03.2023 and 28.12.2023, respectively. The pari materia/ corresponding notification Nos.118/2023, dated 25.08.2023 and 170/2023, dated 17.12.2023 issued by State of Telangana are also subject matter of challenge. These notifications are admittedly issued in purported exercise of power under Section 168A of The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, ‘the GST Act’).
Factual background and Contention of the petitioners:
2. The facts are taken from W.P. No. 33390 of 2024. Sri S. Ravi, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri P. Venkata Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that this matter relates to F.Y. 2019-2020. The show-cause notice was issued on 31.05.2024. The Order-in-Original (‘OIO’) was passed on 29.08.2024 after the maximum period of limitation prescribed under Section 73(10) of the GST Act. Under the garb of extension of limitation as per impugned notifications, said OIO came to be passed. Criticizing the impugned notification Nos. 9 and 56 of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.