Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
RENUKA YARA, J
Sri A. Prabhakar Rao – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. importance of following procedure for cognizance and deletion of accused. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. lack of compliance with procedural requirements results in remand. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. facts leading to the charge against revision petitioners. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri A. Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the revision petitioners/accused Nos.4 and 5 and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent-State. Perused the record.
2. This Criminal Revision Case is filed challenging the impugned docket order of the learned Junior Civil Judge- cum-Judicial First Class Magistrate at Thorrur, in PRC No.14 of 2025, dated 15.04.2025, which is as follows:
“Complainant present and objected for deletion of names of accused No.4 and 5. Heard and perused the record. Prima facie case found against A1 to A5. Hence, this court has taken cognizance against A1 to A5 for the offence punishable U/s.307 IPC r/w 34 of IPC. Issue summons on A1 to A5. Call on 24.01.2025.”
3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners in the grounds of revision urged that the learned Magistrate failed to follow the procedure under Criminal Procedure Code i.e. in cases where the name of the accused ought
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
