THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.13859 of 2025

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.

2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he had purchased the house property from M/s.A.P.Incubators under a registered sale deed dt.13.11.2024 and the said M/s.A.P.Incubators had, in turn, purchased the said property under SARFAESI proceedings initiated against M/s.Sannova Pharma Chemicals Private Limited for recovery of financial facilities extended by Syndicate Bank, which got merged into Canara Bank in the year 2021.

3. It is the further case of the petitioner that he is a bona fide purchaser of the subject property and the petitioner’s vendor suppressing the fact of pendency of S.A.No.419 of 2019 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Hyderabad, (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) had sold the said property and on the aforesaid SA being adjudicated by the Tribunal, one Anjaiah Yadav along with his henchmen had come to the petitioner’s premises and destroyed the Hatchery being done by them and also threatened his people.

4. Petitioner further contends that on the above named persons along with their henchmen resorting to the aforesaid act, he had approached the respondents-authorities and lodged a complaint, on the basis of which, a case has been registered, vide Crime No.97 of 2025 dt.09.03.2025.

5. Petitioner further contends that the respondents-authorities instead of taking action against the persons named in the aforesaid crime, K.Anjaiah and others, on the other hand, have called the petitioner to the police station and have taken his signatures forcibly, whereby it is stated that he would vacate and handover the premises.

6. Petitioner further contends that all the aforesaid actions have been done in the 5^th respondent police station with the active connivance and involvement of the 6^th respondent detaining the petitioner illegally in the police station on 19.03.2025.

7. Petitioner further contends that since the respondents-authorities have acted in connivance with Anjaiah and others in getting the petitioner’s signatures forcibly, as if he has agreed to vacate the subject premises by illegally detaining him, he has approached the 3^rd and 4^th respondents on 20.03.2024 and submitted a representation and inasmuch no action is taken thereon, he had also approached the 2^nd respondent on

19.04.2025 by submitting a representation.

8. Petitioner further contends that if the CCTV footage of 19.03.2025 is called, the entire incident can be noted. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents-authorities to initiate enquiry by collecting and preserving the CCTV footage dt.19.03.2025 of the 5^th respondent police station.

9. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 6 would submit that the petitioner having purchased the property, which is the subject matter of dispute before the Tribunal, only in order to stall the aforesaid order of the Tribunal being enforced, had come with the aforesaid plea.

10. Learned Government Pleader would further submit that if at all the alleged incident, as claimed by the petitioner, had occurred on 19.03.2025, nothing prevented the petitioner from approaching the higher authorities the following day or this Court thereafter; and that insofar as the petitioner approaching the respondents-authorities on 20.04.2025 is concerned, no material is placed before this Court to show that he had approached/taken steps to substantiate his case by approaching the respondents either in person or sending the complaint through registered post.

11. Learned Government Pleader further submits that only as an afterthought and for the purpose of filing of this Writ Petition, the petitioner had approached the 2^nd re