IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NR, J
Pasumala Rudragowni Shanker Goud – Appellant
Versus
The Collector – Respondent
W.P. No. 21608 of 2012
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD MAIN CASE NO: W.P. No. 21608 of 2012 PROCEEDING SHEET
SL. NO.
DATE
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
1 .
2 3-07-2012
L NR,J WP No. 21608 of 2012 Rule nisi. Call for records. Notice returnable in four weeks. ____________ 23.07.2012 WP MP No. 27701 of 2012 After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and on a perusal of the record, this Court prima facie finds that the Tahsildar, Bandalaguda Mandal, who passed the order and resorted to demolition, acted contrary to law. In the order passed on 05.07.2012, the Officer clearly mentioned that an appeal against the same lies to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad. However, he gave 24 hours time to the petitioner to vacate the premises. T h e record discloses that in W.P.No.5732 of 1993, way back on 26.07.1996, this Court recorded a clear finding to the effect that the petitioner constructed house in the year 1978 after obtaining permission from the Gram Panchayat and permitted the respondents therein to pass an order under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act . In his explanation, the petitioner referred to all these facts. Still, the Tahsildar did not refer to them. Demolition was started, before the time for filing the appeal expired.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.