SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 15852

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J. SREENIVAS RAO, J
Ramakrishna Rayabarapu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
Criminal Petition Nos.10090 and 10091 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. T. Bala Mohan Reddy
For the Respondents: Mr. Syed Yasar Mamoon

Conditions of bail may be relaxed for compelling reasons, such as family obligations, provided proper assurances are given.

Headnote:The petitions arise under Section 483(1)(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by petitioners seeking relaxation of bail conditions imposed by the II Additional Sessions Judge. The court finds the request reasonable due to the petitioners' need to travel for their daughter's education, subject to specified conditions. The court encourages compliance, stating that the conditions will be relaxed if affidavits are submitted detailing travel plans. The final order allows the petitioners to travel from 11.08.2025 to 01.09.2025 under appropriate conditions.

Table of Content
1. scope of criminal petitions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. travel justification for bail conditions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 9)
3. conditions of bail and compliance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. final disposition of the case. (Para 10)

COMMON ORDER

These Criminal Petitions are filed under Section 483 (1)(b)

read with 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ) by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 seeking to relax the conditions imposed in Crl.M.P.No.3177 of 2025 dated 27.06.2025 and Crl.M.P.No.3015 of 2025 dated 20.06.2025 respectively on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

2. Since both the criminal petitions arising out of Crime No.4 of 2025 of Police Station CCS, DD, Hyderabad, the same are being disposed of by way of this common order.

3. Heard Mr. T. Bala Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-State.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, while granting bail to the petitioners imposed conditions and the petitioners are complying with the same. He further submitted that the petitioners want to travel United States of America from 11.08.2025 to 01.09.2025 for the purpose of admission of their daughter in May Jean and Frank P. Smeal College of Business at Penn State University Park for Under Graduation Course. Unless the conditions (a) and (d) are relaxed, the petitioners will be put to great hardship.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that if the petitioners give an undertaking and furnishes all the particulars of traveling including their stay and contact details before the Court below, the conditions (a) and (d) may be relaxed for the above said period only.

6. Having considered the submissions made by the respective parties and after perusal of the material available on record, it reveals that the petitioners were accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.4 of 2025 of Police Station CCS, DD, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318 (4), 336(3), 338, 339, 340(2)

and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .

7. The record discloses that the petitioner/accused No.1 had approached II Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, and filed Crl.M.P.No.3177 of 2025 for grant of anticipatory bail and the learned Sessions Judge had allowed the said petition on

27.06.2025 with certain conditions, which reads as follows:

“The petitioner/accused No.1 is directed to surrender before SHO, PS DOW Team-X, CCS, DD, Hyderabad, within 15 days from today. On such surrender, the SHO shall release the petitioner/accused No.1 on his executing personal bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of like such each.

(a) Petitioner shall attend before SHO, PS EOW Team-X, CCS, DD, Hyderabad, on every Monday between 10.00 am and 5.00 pm for a period of two months and till filing of charge sheet, whichever is earlier.

(b) Petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any witness so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

(c) Petitioner at the time of execution of his personal bond to furnish his address to the Court concerned and shall not change his residential address without prior intimation to the Court, till disposal of the case.

(d) Petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court.”

8. Similarly, the petitioner/accused No.2 had approached II Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, and filed Crl.M.P.No.3015 of 2025 for grant of anticipatory bail and the learned Sessions Judge had allowed the said petition on 20.06.2025 with the same conditions as imposed against the petitioner/accused No.1.

9. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are complying with the conditions imposed by the Court below. The specific claim of the petitioners is that they want to travel United States

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top