Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J
K. Arun Kumar Goud – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conditions under which passport issuance is permissible despite pending criminal charges. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. no objections recorded by representatives regarding the petitioner's request. (Para 5) |
| 3. court directives for passport issuance process including submission of affidavits. (Para 6) |
| 4. conclusion of the writ petition with no costs awarded. (Para 7) |
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Angothu Nehru, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondents. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:- “to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in passing the impugned order dated 23.07.2025 in file No.HYFO65176006925 refusing to grant passport to the petitioner only on the ground of pending of the criminal case in CC No.242/2022 in crime No.123/2022 for the offence U/Sec 304-A IPC though pending of the said criminal case does not come the way of considering the passport application of the petitioner as illegal, unlawful and contrary to law and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to grant passport to the petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
