SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SUJANA, J
M. Bixapathy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri A.Rajashekhar Reddy
For the Respondents: Sri M.Vivekananda Reddy

ORDER:

This criminal petition is filed seeking the Court to set aside the order dated 17.02.2025 passed in Crl.R.P.No.70 of 2024 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District confirming the order dated 27.06.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.925 of 2023 in C.C.No.1306 of 2015 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum-IV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Crl.R.P.No.70 of 2024 was filed by the petitioner/revision petitioner/complainant against the order dated 27.06.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.925 of 2023 in C.C.No.1306 of 2015 filed under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking to summon certain documents from the respondent Nos.4 to 7 therein. The trial Court rejected the said application.

3. The appellate Court, after hearing both sides, dismissed the said petition observing that the petitioner had moved application under Section 91 of CPC to summon the documents from the banks, which are not parties to the prosecution and that the revision petitioner did not state any reason to enable the court to come to a conclusion that those documents are required for the purpose of adju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top