Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SUJANA, J
K.Doendar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Ms.Bujala Shailaja – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding document and its admissibility. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the inadmissibility of the document. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on the legal standing of documents. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. final ruling on the document's admissibility. (Para 11) |
| 5. concluding decision of the civil revision petition. (Para 12) |
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.972 of 2025
ORDER:
Challenging the order dated 08.07.2024 passed in I.A.No.39 of 2023 in O.S.No.121 of 2019 by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/plaintiff had filed a petition under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act read with Section 151 CPC seeking permission to lead secondary evidence in the form of a Xerox copy of a document dated 16.05.2010 titled "Family Bhaga Parishkar Settlement". It was the case of the petitioner that the original document was in the possession of respondent/defendant No.2 and that despite issuance of notice for production of the original, the same was not produced. The petitioner contended that the said document was executed b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
