Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E. V. VENUGOPAL, J
A4 to A6 – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petition regarding dowry allegations (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. court's decision on appearance requirements (Para 2 , 3 , 8) |
| 3. arguments on the need for quashing and dispensation (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. final disposition of the petition (Para 9) |
ORDER :
The present criminal petition is filed by the petitioners/A4 to A6 under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the proceedings in CC No.2138 of 2021 on the file of the learned III Metropolitan Magistrate at LB Nagar.
2. Heard Sri V.Yadu Krishna Sainath, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri E.Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1/State and Potakani Satyanand, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
3. As per orders dated 15.12.2021 in IA No.2 of 2021, the prayer portion of the petition was modified by inserting CC No.2138 of
2021 in the place of CC No.2133 of 2021.
4. The brief facts of the case are that the parents of the 2nd respondent paid a dowry of Rs.5,00,000 in cash, 15 tulas of gold for the 2nd respondent and 3.5 tulas of gold for her husband (A1), in exchange for her marriage to accused No. 1. This alliance, however, was formed by concealing the ill-health of the accused No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
