Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
T.V.R. Gangadhar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner’s request for rejoining duty after prolonged absence is evaluated under public service rules. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court assesses the legal implications of absence on employment rights and obligations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal consequences of prolonged unauthorized absence lead to automatic resignation. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court dismisses the petition based on findings regarding absence and procedural compliance. (Para 9 , 10) |
O R D E R:
The case of petitioner is that while working as Mandal Revenue Inspector at Chandrugonda, he was relieved from duty on 28-02-2008 on being posted to Gundala, however, due to ill-health and family issues, he could not join thereat, hence, vide Registered post dated 01-08-2009, he requested for fresh posting orders.
1.1 It is stated, Crime No. 31 of 2009 dated 06-02-2009 was registered against him on the complaint of his wife for the offences under Sections 498-A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and the same ended in acquittal vide C.C.No. 66 of 2015 dated 16-07-2016. It is stated that the 3rd respondent issued order dated 25-09-2009 posting petitioner as Senior Assistant, Tahsil Office, Cherla, however, he was not in receipt of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
