Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Gummalla Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. improper notice issued under bnss. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's directive for lawful procedures in investigations. (Para 4) |
| 3. final ruling sets aside improper notice. (Para 5) |
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G.Aniketh Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
2. This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in harassing the petitioners, threatening them to appear at the police station, and issuing the notice dated 01.08.2025 under Section 94 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 ( BNSS ), as illegal.
3. Respondent No.3 has served a notice under Section 94 of BNSS , dated 01.08.2025, on the petitioners without mentioning any offence, merely asking them to appear before her. The notice refers to Petition No.88 dated 27.07.2025; however, the details of the petition, including the name of the complainant, are not mentioned in the said notice. Without registration of a crime, respondent No.3 cannot issue notice under Section 94 of BNSS directing the petitioners to appear before her.
4. Respondent Nos.1 and 4 are in-laws of respondent No.5. Petitioner No.2 is t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
