Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, M. Ganga Rao, JJ
Vasapu L. Kumar – Appellant
Versus
ONGC Field Operators Union – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of employment disputes (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. history of labor contracts and agreements (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. introduction of writ petitions and appeals (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. decisions on non-maintainability of industrial disputes (Para 12 , 37 , 41) |
| 5. court's considerations on jurisdiction and claims (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. defenses raised by the management (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. analysis of unfair labor practices claims (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 8. distinction between service and labor law in context (Para 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 9. conclusion on appeal outcomes and orders (Para 86 , 88 , 89) |
COMMON JUDGMENT:
(V. Ramasubramanian, J)
Aggrieved by a common order passed by the learned Judge directing the management of ONGC to regularize the services of persons, who had completed 240 days of service in a period of 12 months, after their appointments on tenure basis in the year 2008, together with notional benefits, the management of ONGC has come up with 24 writ appeals. The 25th writ appeal (W.A.No.285/2017) is filed by an individual, who applied for appointment to a post in ONGC, pursuant to the recruitment notification issued in September, 2014. His dream is that if hundreds of wor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
